|

Introduction Copyright © Carmel Bird 1998.
All rights reserved.
part one
part three |
The findings of 1948 International Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide came into force in Australia
in 1951. One of the definitions of genocide is: 'the forcible
transferring of children of a group to another group'. A state
can not excuse itself by claiming that the practice of genocide
was previously lawful under its own laws or that its people did
not (or do not) share the outrage of the international community.
White Australians need to read the stories of the people who suffered
systematically and in so many ways at the hands of white Australians,
principally of earlier generations. Indigenous people told their
stories to the Inquiry and many of these stories are quoted in
the report. The courage, dignity and generosity, as well as the
tragedy, of these storytellers shines out in their words, delivered
from the heart and written in tears.
When I read the report it became a matter of passionate urgency
to me that the oral histories told in it should be made accessible
to everyone. People in other countries wished to know the stories
I had read in Bringing Them Home. Of all the means of making the stories known -- including publishing
them on the Internet at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rslibrary/hreoc/stolen/ -- collecting them in a small book seemed to me to be the simplest
and, in the long run, perhaps the most effective. I realise that
images are in many ways more immediately powerful than printed
words, that television and film are the key media in promoting
a message to the world. But I still think that a small and portable
paperback book is still a useful storytelling tool, a carrier
of messages. Reading a book is a private experience, a perfect
way to receive the intimate and personal oral histories of these
courageous and sorrowful people. If all the machines shut down,
if the systems fail, so long as the sun shines, or we can light
a candle, a few people may be able to shelter in some corner of
the globe and read the stories in books. Books may be rapidly
becoming drab, outmoded technology, but they have the potential,
in their simplicity, to be the great survivors, in the end. A
bit like the cockroaches, supposedly the life-form that will survive
a nuclear holocaust, a few books may still be bearing their messages
when everything else has melted. It doesn't take much to get a
book to work.
Most of the people whose stories are collected here first saw
their stories in print in Bringing Them Home. They are people who were brutally and wrongfully separated from
their mothers, their fathers, their families and communities when
they were very young, people whose attachment to their own contexts
were severed and destroyed. Remembering their lives, telling their
stories to the Inquiry was difficult and heart-rending for them.
Seeing the stories in print was a new and shocking confrontation
with the horrors of the past. Several of these people have agreed
to republish their stories in The Stolen Children -- Their Stories,
hoping that the stories will reach a wider audience, and help
to convince all Australians that an apology is due to those who
have come to be known as the stolen generations. Something I understand
but deeply regret is that a few of the people whose stories are
published in the report were unable to face the experience of
seeing the story reprinted here, and so their stories have had
to be omitted. One of the storytellers, Carol, requested that
the version of her story published here should be more detailed
than the version included in the Report.
Most of the storytellers were interested in the idea of this book
as a means of bringing their experiences to the consciousness
of all, and were eager to co-operate. I wrote to the storytellers
and asked them for permission to reprint their stories. Some of
them, when they rang me, told me they had been to the library
to check me out. They knew where and when I was born, and the
names of some of my family, and the titles of my books. The experience
of receiving their permission was unlike any previous experience
I have had when putting together an anthology of other people's
writing. These writers had already consulted their brothers and
sisters before phoning me, and the phone calls we had were long
and warm and very friendly and funny and sad. In some cases I
did not speak to the storyteller, but to a member of the extended
family. Some of the stories here were not included in the original
report, but are further documentation of the sadness of much of
our history.
When people tell their stories, they usually enjoy feeling proud,
and delight in being named and in claiming their own history.
Not so the stolen children. The names under which these stories
appear are not the real names of the writers. This is because
the writers feel they must remain anonymous so that they cannot
be identified as the people who have suffered as they have suffered.
Their friends, employers, families might see them differently
if they knew who they really were. This anonymity is yet another
tragic element in this deep, vast tale of pain and sorrow that
is a central part of the story of our country.
I would have liked to include photographs of the people who told
the stories, pictures to illuminate and illustrate the stories,
but of course that was not possible. The people must remain not
only nameless, but faceless. Neither was it possible to give biographical
details of the writers, as is usually the case in an anthology
of stories. The real people behind the stories of the stolen children
must continue to remain faceless, to exist in the shadows of our
history, until such time as Indigenous and non-Indigenous people
in Australia are one, until our differences are reconciled, until
the past is examined and mourned, and we can move on.
It is a commonplace notion that severe loss in any form has to
be confronted, examined, acknowledged, discussed, exposed before
a process of emotional and even physical healing can begin. One
of the most powerful and effective ways people have of recovering
from loss is the telling of the personal stories associated with
the loss. The Church offers the confessional as part of this process;
in modern society many people seek the help of counsellors and
psychiatrists to whom they can unburden their souls, to whom they
can tell their own stories of loss and pain. Listen to me, we
say, let me tell you what has happened to me, let me tell you
my story. If I can make you understand me, I may better understand
myself. When people told their stories to the Inquiry many of
them found that the act of telling was personally. The act of
listening is the other part of telling; you can't really tell
a story unless somebody is listening. And in this case the listeners
have as much at stake as the tellers. If Australia will listen
to the stolen children and take their stories in and let those
stories live in the consciousness of the country, this country
will begin to heal the wounds of over two hundred years of deliberate
and unconscious abuses of human rights.
I am indebted to Karen Menzies, a social worker who has acted
as an intermediary between myself and the storytellers, for her
sensitive understanding, patience and insight. Without her help
it would not have been possible for me to compile this anthology.
And I am also profoundly grateful to Sir Ronald Wilson for writing
a Preface for the book, and to the historian Henry Reynolds for
writing an Afterword that sets out in brief the history of white
supremacy and racial discrimination that characterised the 'settling'
of Australia by Europeans, and that is still ingrained in our
society. Martin Flanagan wrote 'Brother' particularly for this
book, and Veronica Brady's piece was also specially written for
the 'Perspective' section. Robert Manne, Marilyn Lake, Lang Dean
and Jack Waterford donated their published writing. I have placed
these alongside extracts of speeches made in Parliament at the
time of the tabling of the Report.The section 'Perspectives' could
have been a vast, almost unending collection of responses to the
Report, but I have selected just a few pieces which seem to me
to form a kind of frame for the stories of the stolen children
themselves.
No two words strike deeper into the human heart than the words
'stolen children'. Nothing is more valuable to us than our children,
nothing so irreplaceable, so precious, so beloved. The history
of white Australians is marred by children lost in the bush, children
spirited away by unknown agents. The stories of these children
have become the stuff of myth, icons of horror, and they ring
with the notes of darkest nightmare. How must it be, then, to
be such children, stolen children. How must it be to be children
who have been snatched from their mothers and systematically stripped
of culture, language, rights and dignity? To be such children
who grow to be an adults within the very society that visited
these crimes upon them. Yet the storytellers in this book are
distinguished by a courage and a generosity that speaks with the
voice of grace.
The conjunction of the words 'stolen' and 'children' is a horror
for both parties, for the child and for the mother. Etched into
the stories collected here are the grief and suffering of the
mothers. As Murray says in his Journal: 'the worst thing that
could ever happen to any woman black or white was to have her
children taken from her'. Many members of the stolen generations
suffered first as children who were taken and later as mothers
whose children were removed.
The stolen children in this book speak of a feeling of emptiness,
of having a sense of a hole in their hearts as they recall their
loss of family, language, culture, identity. They catalogue the
abuses they suffered at the hands of white families and missionaries,
but the original wound is that which was inflicted at the moment
they were torn from their mothers. Sometimes this happened with
the mother's consent, the family being tricked into believing
the separation was for the good of the child who would go away
and be nurtured and educated and even loved. The tragic irony
of this is brought out in 'Anne's Story'.
Sometimes it is the small details that have been etched in a child's
memory that emphasise the horror of what happened to these children.
One such detail is not in this book because the writer was one
of those who could not bear to repeat the experience of seeing
her story in print for a second time. However it is a detail that
returns to me constantly for its simple and awful symbolism. This
girl was sent to a white family at Christmas time. The daughter
of the house received the gift of a bride doll, while the Indigenous
child received a Raggedy Ann. A similarly striking incident occurs
in 'John's Story'. When they arrived at the orphanage the small
boys each carried a little suitcase containing only a Bible which
was their treasure and which somehow gave them a kind of identity.
The first thing they had to do, before having their heads shaved,
was to cast their little suitcases, Bible and all, into a bonfire.
When you read the stories of the stolen children you will begin
to know and feel how life has been -- how life is -- for many
Indigenous Australians, people who were taken from their families
as tiny babies or as children, and you can not fail to be moved.
And don't imagine that the children of today are immune. Part
Six of Bringing Them Home is titled 'Contemporary Separations' and begins with a quotation
from the Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia: 'The fact
remains that Aboriginal children are still being removed from
their families at an unacceptable rate, whether by the child welfare
or the juvenile justice systems, or both'.
 |
|